Purview governs your Microsoft AI. PromptKing governs everything else.

What Microsoft Purview covers

Microsoft Purview provides deep governance within the Microsoft boundary — excellent for organisations standardised on Microsoft AI.

• ✓Microsoft 365 Copilot
• ✓Copilot Studio agents
• ✓Azure OpenAI
• ✓GitHub Copilot (Microsoft umbrella)

If your organisation runs exclusively on Microsoft AI, Purview is excellent.

What falls outside Purview's scope

The average enterprise runs 6–8 AI vendors. Purview covers 2–3.

What the gap looks like in practice

A financial services firm using M365 Copilot, Claude for credit assessment, and Llama on Bedrock for document processing has Purview coverage for Copilot and zero governance tooling for the other two — which happen to be Annex III high-risk use cases under the EU AI Act.

How PromptKing fills the gap

Same Article 26 evidence model as Purview. Same FOCUS 1.4 export standard. Covering the vendors Purview cannot reach. Not competing — complementing.

• ›Cross-vendor seat intelligence — ghost seats, utilisation, rightsizing
• ›EU AI Act Annex III classification and Article 26 Deployer Evidence Packs
• ›Connector confidence grading (A–D) — no silent mixing of data quality
• ›FOCUS 1.4 conformant export — unifies with Purview in Power BI or Snowflake
• ›GPAI vendor compliance matrix — CoP status for Claude, Gemini, Grok, Llama

The architecture

PromptKing runs above telemetry, not inside it. LangSmith tells you how a prompt executed. OpenTelemetry tells you how a system performed. PromptKing tells you what it cost, whether you can trust it, and whether you're compliant.